Americans are already what racial purists have long feared: a people characterized by a great deal of racial admixture, or what many in the past referred to distastefully as "mongrelization. Some were joyful, passionate, loving affairs. Many were rapes. Others contained elements of both choice and coercion. These different kinds of interracial intimacy and sexual depredation all reached their peak in the United States during the age of slavery, and following the Civil War they decreased markedly.
Since the end of the civil-rights revolution interracial dating, interracial sex, and interracial marriage have steadily increased, as has the of children born of interracial unions. This development has prompted commentators to speak of the "creolization" or "browning" or "beiging" of America.
Over the years legions of white-supremacist legislators, judges, prosecutors, police officers, and other officials have attempted to prohibit open romantic interracial attachments, particularly those between black men and white women.
From the s to the s, forty-one territories, colonies, or states enacted laws—anti-miscegenation statutes—barring sex or marriage between blacks and whites, and many states ultimately made marriage across the color line a felony. Such laws crystallized attitudes about interracial intimacy that remain influential today, but all were invalidated by the U.
Supreme Court inin the most aptly named case in all of American constitutional history: Loving v. Commonwealth of Virginia. Although white and black Americans are far more likely to date and marry within their own race than outside it, the cultural environment has changed considerably since Loving.
Recall what happened in the spring ofwhen George W. Bush, at a crucial moment in his primary campaign, paid a highly publicized visit to Bob Jones University, in South Carolina. During that visit he offered no criticism of the university's then existing prohibition against interracial dating. In the controversy that ensued, no nationally prominent figures defended Bob Jones's policy.
Public opinion not only forced Bush to distance himself from Bob Jones but also prompted the notoriously stubborn and reactionary administration of that institution to drop its ban. The de-stigmatization in this country of interracial intimacy is profoundly encouraging. Against the tragic backdrop of American history, it is a that Frederick Douglass may have been right when he prophesied, even before the abolition of slavery, that eventually "the white and colored people of this country [can] be blended into a common nationality, and enjoy together The great but altogether predictable irony is that just as white opposition to white-black intimacy finally lessened, during the last third of the twentieth century, black opposition became vocal and aggressive.
In college classrooms today, when discussions about the ethics of interracial dating and marriage arise, black students are frequently the ones most likely to voice disapproval. Despite some ongoing resistance a subject to which I will returnthe situation for people involved in interracial intimacy has never been better.
Millions of george floyds
For the most part, the law prohibits officials from taking race into in licensing marriages, making child-custody decisions, and arranging adoptions. Moreover, the American public accepts interracial intimacy as it never has before. This trend will almost certainly continue; polling data and common observation indicate that young people tend to be more liberal on these matters than their elders. In there were about 51, black-white married couples in the United States; in there were 65, in there were , in there were , and by the had reachedIn other words, in the past four decades black-white marriages increased more than sixfold.
And black-white marriages are not only becoming more numerous. ly, the new couples in mixed marriages tended to be older than other brides and grooms. They were frequently veterans of divorce, embarking on second or third marriages. In recent years, however, couples in mixed marriages seem to be marrying younger than their pioneering predecessors and seem more inclined to have children and to pursue all the other "normal" activities that married life offers.
It should be stressed that black-white marriages remain remarkably rare—fewer than one percent of the total. Inwhenblack-white couples were married, 55, couples were married overall. Moreover, the racial isolation of blacks on the marriage market appears to be greater than that of other people of color: much larger percentages of Native Americans and Asian-Americans marry whites.
According to Census data, in the age cohort twenty-five to thirty-four, 36 percent of U. Only eight percent of African-American husbands and only four percent of African-American wives had white spouses.
The sociologist Nathan Glazer was correct in stating, in The Public Interest Septemberthat "blacks stand out uniquely among the array of American ethnic and racial groups in the degree to which marriage remains within the group.
But the disparity is real: it has to do not only with demographics but also with generations' worth of subjective judgments about marriageability, beauty, personality, comfort, compatibility, and prestige. Even now a wide array of social pressures continue to make white-black marriages more difficult and thus less frequent than other interethnic or interracial marriages.
Nevertheless, the trend toward more interracial marriage is clear, as is a growing acceptance of the phenomenon.
Why black men love white women
Some African-Americans whose positions make them directly dependent on black public opinion have nonetheless married whites without losing their footing. A good example is Julian Bond, the chairman of the board of directors of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People.
Though married to a white woman, Bond ascended to the chairmanship of the oldest and most influential black-advancement organization in the country inand as of this writing continues to enjoy widespread support within the NAACP. There are other s that black-white romance has become more widely accepted; indeed, it is quite fashionable in some contexts.
Are you looking for hot dates in your neighbourhood?
One is advertising. When advertisers addressing general audiences use romance to deliver their messages, they most often depict couples of the same race. But now at least occasionally one sees interracial couples deployed as enticements to shop at Diesel or Club Monaco, or to buy furniture from ikea, jeans from Guess, sweaters from Tommy Hilfiger, cologne from Calvin Klein, or water from Perrier. Although most of these organizations lack deep roots, many display a vigor and resourcefulness that suggest they will survive into the foreseeable future. They stem from and represent a community in the making.
It is a community united by a demand that the larger society respect and be attentive to people who by descent or by choice fall outside conventional racial groupings: interracial couples, parents of children of a different race, and children of parents of a different race. Those within this community want it known that they are not products or agents of an alarming mongrelization, as white racists still believe; nor are they inauthentic and unstable in-betweeners, as some people of color would have it.
They want security amid the established communities from which they have migrated. They want to emerge from what the writer Lise Funderburg has identified as the "racial netherworld," and they want to enjoy interaction with others without regret or fear, defensiveness or embarrassment. African-Americans largely fall into three camps with respect to white-black marriage. One camp, relatively small, openly champions it as a good. Its members argue that increasing rates of interracial marriage will decrease social segregation, encourage racial open-mindedness, enhance blacks' access to enriching social networks, elevate their status, and empower black women in their interactions with black men by subjecting the latter to greater competition in the marketplace for companionship.
A second camp sees interracial marriage merely as a choice that individuals should have the right to make. For example, while noting in Race Matters that "more and more white Americans are willing to interact sexually with black Americans on an equal basis ," Cornel West maintains that he views this as "neither cause for celebration nor reason for lament. It allows a person simultaneously to oppose anti-miscegenation laws and to disclaim any desire to marry across racial lines.
Dating while black: online, but invisible
Many African-Americans are attracted to this position, because, among other things, it helps to refute a deeply annoying assumption on the part of many whites: that blacks would like nothing more than to be intimate with whites and even, if possible, to become white. A third camp opposes interracial marriage, on the grounds that it expresses racial disloyalty, suggests disapproval of fellow blacks, undermines black culture, weakens the African-American marriage market, and feeds racist mythologies, particularly the canard that blacks lack pride of race.
Such opposition has always been a powerful undercurrent. When Walter White, the executive secretary of the NAACP, divorced his black wife the mother of their two children and married a white woman from South Africa, inthe Norfolk Virginia Journal and Guide spoke for many blacks when it asserted, "A prompt and official announcement that [White] will not return to his post Part stemmed from a widespread sense that perhaps White thought no black woman was good enough for him. By the late s, with the repudiation of anti-miscegenation and Jim Crow laws, increasing s of blacks felt emboldened to openly oppose mixed marriages.
To blacks, interracial intimacy compromised that allegiance.
Yet many black activists denounced him for marrying and remaining married to a white woman. When he addressed a rally in Washington, D. Where's your white wife? Julius Lester, a longtime member of the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee, wrote a book with one of the most arresting titles of that flamboyant era: Look Out, Whitey!
But to many black activists, Lester's writings and ideas were decidedly less ificant than his choice of a white wife. To them, his selection bespoke hypocrisy. Ridiculing Lester, one black woman wrote a letter to the editor of Ebony in which she suggested that it was foolish to regard him as a trustworthy leader.
Mix and match: an experiment in interracial dating
After all, she cautioned, he couldn't even "crawl out of bed" with whites. The "sleeping white" critique embarrassed a wide variety of people as distinctions between the personal and the political evaporated. At many colleges and universities black students ostracized other blacks who dated much less married whites. A black student who wanted to walk around "with a blonde draped on his arm" could certainly do so, a black student leader at the University of Washington told St.
Clair Drake, a leading African-American sociologist. When he visited his old high school inhe says, the Black Student Union refused to have anything to do with him, because he was involved in an interracial relationship. Drake's classmate Charles V. In some instances black opposition to interracial intimacy played a part in destroying a marriage.
For two years he attended Howard University, which he detested. He served in the Air Force for a short time, and in he moved to Greenwich Village.